Tuesday, February 14, 2012
Does familiarity breed contempt?
While contempt seems to be a very strong word, on initial scrutiny of this saying it does seem to hold some truth. Consider the new employee, the new student, the new neighbor, the new bride. After the honeymoon phase of belonging to a new group there does seem to be a time of disenchantment. The idealization that occurs initially is replaced by reality, which can be disappointing. This would account for Tuckman’s second stage of group development, storming. The individual members and the group as a whole are dealing with the paradoxes Smith and Berg describe in their book about group life. Individuals begin to deal with others’ idiosyncrasies and the paradoxes of belonging. Learning to accept another’s identity and individuality while at the same time feeling as if your identity and individuality are respected can be a stressful. It is during this storming phase that issues regarding involvement and boundaries must be addressed. I believe that unsuccessful assimilation of these paradoxes into group life can in fact lead to contempt. If one person does not feel recognized for their involvement or if an individual does not feel their boundaries are being respected their excitement of forming can become contempt for others in the group. A balance must be achieved in which both the individual and the group maintain identity, individuality, involvement and boundaries. Once these paradoxes of belonging are identified then they can be appreciated by all and norming can occur. The sense of commitment between members and to the group dispels the harshness of reality allowing equilibrium. Once these process dimensions of group life are addressed than actual performing can take place. The self-oriented behaviors of initial group development that led to the feelings of dislike will give way to more productive task dimensions. It is not the familiarity then that breeds contempt it is the exact opposite. Not becoming familiar enough with the paradoxical struggles, the unsuccessful self-reflection by the group and individuals, that breeds contempt.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Linda,
ReplyDeleteCould individuals and groups also neglect to conduct any self-reflection at all? Or perhaps you were including this phenomenon within "unsuccessful self-reflection"? Another point I've been wondering about that you referenced - What does Tuckman think about the possibility that the storming stage "might be unpleasant" (Levi, p.39) to the extent that it irrevocably damages the potential for future group cohesion? In reality, group life is often even more turbulent and messy than the author describes.
Good questions Adam. I do think some individuals/groups completely lack an observing ego. Though I've never thought about it until you asked...I have seen storming result in such a way that the group/individual never recovered; engaging skills never developed. You know, as heady as Smith & Berg's analysis of group dynamics is, I believe you are right, actual group life and dynamics are even more ethereal than that!
ReplyDeleteLinda,
ReplyDeleteGreat blog thought....this whole idea that you introduce about disenchantment I think ties in very nicely with Smith & Berg's, Paradoxes of Group Life, information on disclosure..."of course were I able to accept myself, with all my flaws, acceptance by others' ...thus the acceptance I gain is unacceptable to me based on the parts of me that I know are unacceptable(Smith & Berg 112). So, pondering this information I am just wondering if this is part of this disenchantment? If we cannot accept ourselves and our own baggage I feel as though we would be both disenchanted with ourselves leading us to be disenchanted with others. My personal experience with groups tells me that if we as an individual member of the group does not feel good about our contributions in the group, we tend to project these thoughts/feelings onto other group members. What do you think?
Yes, I agree with comments about projection and the need for authentic disclosure to allow for genuine trust. Perhaps this is part of the disenchantment - it seems very likely. The idealization of a team or relationship is unhealthy...but I'm not sure where that idealization originates from. Surely, from within the individual...but why? Is it regression gone a muck? Is it from lack of self acceptance? Hopefully I will gain even more perspective as the class continues. :-)
ReplyDelete